I have been transcribing Mary Church Terrell. I have misread one item numerous times and today finally got a document that was more clearly written. She was a member of a Matron's Whist Club. The problem is that I had read it as Watrous, mistaking her M for a W and n for a u. I just wanted to alert the board in case someone is reviewing my documents in her diaries from 1905,1908 and 1909.
Henry, I've had that experience, too. In an effort to prevent that happening in my own work, I had to change my approach. At first, I would transcribe a page, and then as soon as I was done, submit it for review. Then I had the experience of realizing what a word was that I'd at first misunderstood or left as question. Now if I have a page with a mystery word, then I don't send it for review until I have transcribed all pages of the document. Sometimes, after going back and rereading it as a whole, I found that the word would suddenly make sense. It's the funny way the mind works, or at least the way mine does.
I know your example works across many documents, and it makes me wonder if I should hold back more documents until all hope of figuring out the mystery word is gone. But then I realize that sometimes I just have to let it go and hope the reviewer can figure it out.
I hope that in the future, the developers create a way for someone to open up a document again when there has been a mistake that is discovered after the document has been submitted for review or after it's been completed.
Oh! I've been wanting to engage in this question!
Julianne, when I started, I began doing what you're doing, which is to have a few things open and in progress, but at some point it seemed that I was holding things up, or it seemed as if someone else had jumped on, and I got confused and stopped doing that.
Is it possible for two people to pick up a "work in progress" and move it along? Is the file locked if someone is actively in it?
I intend to go with my gut and try it again. As a neophyte, who knows what I did back then! I might not have been logged in, or I might have inadvertently closed it, sent it to review, who knows!
I very much like Henry's suggestion of being recognized as the transcriber. Goodness knows I blush at my first few transcriptions where I... oh, I won't even admit to what I did..!!
I was also mulling the idea of having groups that review each other's work. This would be especially helpful in moving something along when the transcript is clean except for a word or two. To be able to pass it on to an individual just for that final check would speed up some easy "completes".
Suz.
Hi Suzanne,
A page is only locked when someone has the tab open and has made a save within the last 10 minutes. If you enter text, click save, and then navigate away from the page it will become free within 10 minutes.
As for attribution Henry Rosenberg, we think it's important for volunteers to be able to see what they have transcribed in their own profile, but that many people prefer privacy and the chance to learn as they go. Attribution might make that awkward or lead to unhelpful back and forth between volunteers who develop a distrust of one another's work--this happens in a lot of online spaces unfortunately. That said, we might be able to implement the option for people to display their identification as transcribers on their work, if there was high demand down the line. We might be able to discover if there were demand via a survey. This would take a lot of careful thought and testing. We'll be sure to involve you and other volunteers if and when the time comes.
The community managers have been chatting about your wonderful threads here on HH and want to encourage your ideas of asking one another to review your transcriptions and of looking out for things that are of particular interest to one another. Perhaps a buddy system or interest group is in order? We leave it to you to design that in whatever way best meets your needs. We're happy to help if there's anything we can do.
Happy transcribing and reviewing!
Hi Suzanne,
A page is only locked when someone has the tab open and has made a save within the last 10 minutes. If you enter text, click save, and then navigate away from the page it will become free within 10 minutes.
As for attribution Henry Rosenberg, we think it's important for volunteers to be able to see what they have transcribed in their own profile, but that many people prefer privacy and the chance to learn as they go. Attribution might make that awkward or lead to unhelpful back and forth between volunteers who develop a distrust of one another's work--this happens in a lot of online spaces unfortunately. That said, we might be able to implement the option for people to display their identification as transcribers on their work, if there was high demand down the line. We might be able to discover if there were demand via a survey. This would take a lot of careful thought and testing. We'll be sure to involve you and other volunteers if and when the time comes.
The community managers have been chatting about your wonderful threads here on HH and want to encourage your ideas of asking one another to review your transcriptions and of looking out for things that are of particular interest to one another. Perhaps a buddy system or interest group is in order? We leave it to you to design that in whatever way best meets your needs. We're happy to help if there's anything we can do.
Happy transcribing and reviewing!
Hi Victoria- I'm not sure I was asking for attribution. I'm happy to do the work without recognition.
I agree there could be a lot of back and forth. I have seen documents I transcribed earlier that were reviewed,edited and submitted for review. When I came across them, either I made an error that was not corrected or the reviewer made an error correcting something I transcribed and I corrected it again. I can imagine me and my reviewer getting into a disagreement.
However, if I could copy and paste something on this site to ask a question to a participant or moderator, it may be helpful. Some words truly stump me and some take time to get. Also, the chance to review my own submitted transcriptions, would alleviate the problem of when it comes to me later.
I have had a similar reaction as Suzanne. I would rather submit for review than hold up the transcription and leave it as in progress. I have seen some "in progress" where the transcriber seems to have become frustrated and gave up and others where they pretty much had it down and should have submitted it.
Sorry, if I am going on too much. We are all having a great time doing this, appreciate what you are doing and the fact that we are contributing to making these documents available to the public.
I recently saw where Mary Church Terrell saw Charles Lindbergh at the Temporary White House after his transAtlantic flight. First, I didn't know the White House was being renovated in 1927 and found it interesting how much of a hero worshipper she admitted to being. One other item I saw from 1908. She was called the "n" word on a trolley, confronted the man who said it and slapped him. Her struggle for civil rights was incremental and it has been interesting watching her grow and gain the confidence to do such a thing.
Stay well, Henry
Thank you, Victoria.
That clears up some early confusion. I had kept a doc (or two) open figuring I'd be able to decipher a couple of things once I got used to the penmanship and did some research on a name.... I did figure things out in the end, but when I went back the copy and the status had both changed, and my hands were tied. Especially since I didn't think the edit was correct.
After following some of these threads, I now know I could go back (if I could find it!) and add tags...
These threads are certainly helpful... and if I haven't mentioned it before, the "You've Got This! Start typing!" in the copy window is a great way to encourage newbies to do it. If it didn't already interest us, we wouldn't be snooping around, so thank you for throwing out the welcome mat with such bright enthusiasm!
Suz.
That story you shared about MTC is so moving Henry, thank you for sharing it. If you happen to remember the link and can share it here, that would be amazing. The best way to do that is to type everything you want to say, and then highlight a relevant couple of words and click on the link button in the comment box. That will let you turn those words into a link without the site freezing, which it unfortunately does if you just copy straight into the box. We hope that will get fixed soon.
I'm signing off for the weekend, but thank you to everyone who joined in the discussion this week! Lauren Algee
will be answering questions and tweets etc next week. I'll pop up to read your delightful comments. Thanks everyone for your incredible generosity and good humor.
-Victoria
These are the incidents I referred to previously. At least now I know how to post links.
The "N" word incident is from July 27 1908 and continued on July 28 1908.
She saw Lindberg at the temporary White House.
Interesting stuff.
I tried those links, but they don't work. The links are missing the colon after https. Henry, did you copy and paste the link? I know you can't copy them into the dialog box, but you probably can when you use the link icon in the toolbar.
Julianne-
I'm pretty sure I copied and pasted after clicking the link icon. I'll try again. Let me know if this works. I want to make sure I can send links if need be. Thanks.
Julianne-
I'll try again. Try these links. Let me know if they work.
Thanks, Henry
These work just fine. Thanks.
